Susie's Reviews All articles
Culture & Opinion

Dating Less Desperately: I Tested All the 'Low Effort, High Standards' Advice Flooding My For You Page

Susie's Reviews
Dating Less Desperately: I Tested All the 'Low Effort, High Standards' Advice Flooding My For You Page

Somewhere between my third situationship and a Reddit thread titled "stop auditioning for people who aren't even paying attention," I decided I needed a new approach to dating. The internet, as always, had thoughts. A lot of them. Whole TikTok subcultures have built themselves around the idea of doing less — texting less, caring less visibly, protecting your emotional bandwidth like it's a finite resource (which, honestly, it is).

So I did what I do. I made a list. I tested the strategies. I reported back.

Here's what two months of "bare minimum" dating actually looked like from the inside.

What Even Is 'Bare Minimum' Dating?

The phrase gets used two different ways online, and the confusion is worth naming. Sometimes it's a criticism — "he's doing the bare minimum and she's calling it a green flag" — meaning someone is getting praised for basic human decency. But the version I was testing flips it: you do the bare minimum until someone proves they deserve more of you. You stop over-investing early. You match energy instead of exceeding it. You treat your attention as something worth earning.

The core idea is that a lot of dating exhaustion comes from people (often women, but genuinely not exclusively) putting in enormous emotional labor for people who haven't reciprocated or even indicated they plan to. The fix, according to every third video on my feed, is to simply... stop doing that.

Simple in theory. Wildly uncomfortable in practice, at least for me.

Strategy One: The Delayed Response

The rule here is straightforward — don't reply to texts immediately. Not as a game, supposedly, but as a way of not organizing your whole day around someone else's communication schedule.

I tried this for three weeks. Honest result? Mixed. On one hand, I stopped that thing where I'd send a message and then hover anxiously waiting for the three dots to appear. Giving myself permission to respond when I actually had mental space made texting feel less like a performance review. That part was genuinely nice.

On the other hand, I caught myself thinking about not texting in a way that felt just as consuming as the texting itself. "It's been 45 minutes, is that enough? Should I wait longer?" If you're tracking the clock, you're still not free. The strategy works better when it's a genuine habit than when it's a deliberate tactic, and getting there takes longer than three weeks.

Verdict: Useful in spirit, annoying in execution until it becomes automatic.

Strategy Two: Stop Explaining Yourself

This one hit different. The advice is basically: you don't owe anyone a paragraph-long justification for your preferences, your schedule, or your boundaries. "I can't make it Thursday" is a complete sentence. You don't have to apologize for not being available.

I tested this mostly in early-stage dating conversations, and genuinely — this one changed something for me. I have a long history of over-explaining myself to people who didn't ask for an explanation, preemptively managing their potential disappointment. Stopping that felt uncomfortable for about a week and then felt like putting down a bag I'd forgotten I was carrying.

The people who pushed back on me not explaining myself were, it turns out, not people I wanted to keep dating. That information was free and arrived early. I'll take it.

Verdict: Legitimately useful. Highly recommend.

Strategy Three: Refuse to Define the Relationship First

The internet is very insistent that whoever brings up "what are we" first loses some kind of power. So I tried waiting. Letting the other person lead. Not asking the question I definitely wanted to ask.

This was, without question, the worst one. I spent two weeks in a low-grade state of uncertainty with someone I genuinely liked because I was following advice designed to protect me from caring too much. Instead, I just cared the same amount with no information. That's not protection. That's just suspense with no payoff.

The "don't be the first to define things" strategy seems to assume that the goal is to win a negotiation rather than build something with someone. Those are different goals. If you want the second thing, waiting around hoping the other person materializes the conversation isn't a power move — it's just passive.

Verdict: Hard pass. Ask your questions. You're allowed.

Strategy Four: Keep Your Own Life Full

This one is less a tactic and more a philosophy, and it's the one that holds up the best under scrutiny. The idea: don't create space in your life for a person before they've actually shown up consistently. Keep your plans, your friendships, your routines. Let someone fit into your life rather than restructuring your life to accommodate someone who's still a question mark.

I didn't have to manufacture this one — I just stopped canceling things for people I'd been on three dates with. I went to the concert with my friends. I kept my Saturday morning routine. And something interesting happened: I stopped feeling like dating was this consuming project that required constant management. It was just... a thing I was doing alongside the rest of my life.

People who liked me seemed more interested when I wasn't rearranging everything for them. People who expected me to rearrange everything revealed that expectation pretty quickly. Again, useful information, delivered early, at no additional cost.

Verdict: The one that actually works, and it's not really a game — it's just having a life.

The Bigger Picture

Here's what I kept bumping up against: a lot of "bare minimum" dating advice is trying to solve a real problem (people exhausting themselves for relationships that don't go anywhere) with tactics that sometimes just create a different kind of exhaustion. Performing detachment is still a performance. Strategically withholding yourself is still organizing your behavior around someone else's potential reaction.

The stuff that genuinely helped me wasn't the tactics — it was the underlying shift in how I thought about my own attention and time. Treating those things as valuable, not as something I needed to hand over immediately to prove I was worth dating. That part? Real. Useful. Would recommend to a friend.

The specific rules about response times and who texts first? Mostly just noise.

Dating is already kind of a lot. You don't have to make it a strategy game on top of everything else. Know what you want, be honest about it, keep your own life intact, and stop explaining yourself to people who haven't earned the footnotes.

That's about as bare minimum as it needs to get.

All Articles

Related Articles

I Spent Four Mondays Doing Basically Nothing on Purpose — My Anxiety Did Not Get the Memo

I Spent Four Mondays Doing Basically Nothing on Purpose — My Anxiety Did Not Get the Memo

I Went on 50 Dates From Dating Apps So You Can Stop Wondering If They Actually Work

I Went on 50 Dates From Dating Apps So You Can Stop Wondering If They Actually Work

The Internet Keeps Selling Burned-Out Workers a New Rebellion — I Tested the Whole Menu

The Internet Keeps Selling Burned-Out Workers a New Rebellion — I Tested the Whole Menu